In alternative dispute resolution (ADR), the majority of cases are typically resolved through which method?

In alternative dispute resolution (ADR), mediation is the most commonly utilized method. This process involves a neutral third-party mediator who assists the disputing parties in reaching a mutually satisfactory agreement. Mediation is favored in ADR due to its collaborative nature and the flexibility it offers both parties in negotiating a resolution that meets their needs and interests.

One of the main advantages of mediation is that it often leads to quicker and less expensive resolutions compared to litigation, which can be protracted and adversarial. This makes mediation a more appealing option for many parties seeking to resolve disputes outside of a courtroom setting. Additionally, mediation allows for more control over the outcome by the parties involved, enhancing the chances of compliance with the agreement since it is reached collaboratively.

Other options, such as litigation, are less prevalent in ADR since they involve formal court proceedings, which can be costly and time-consuming. Investigation and consultation are not typically recognized as distinct methods for resolving disputes in the same way that mediation or arbitration are. Thus, mediation stands out as the predominant method in the ADR landscape, making it the correct answer.