What happens when a Supreme Court remands a case?

When a Supreme Court remands a case, it means that the Court is sending it back to a lower court, often the trial court, for further action or additional steps. This can occur for a variety of reasons, such as the need for the lower court to reevaluate evidence, apply a new standard of law established by the Supreme Court, or conduct a new trial in light of the Supreme Court's interpretation of the law. A remand does not inherently mean that the decision of the lower court was incorrect; rather, it is a directive for further proceedings that align with the Supreme Court's findings.

The other options do not accurately describe what occurs during a remand. An overturned verdict would imply a decisive conclusion by the Supreme Court, which is not the intention behind a remand; instead, it is about further evaluating the case. A remand does not automatically result in an appeal being denied, nor does it dismiss the case altogether; it allows for the possibility of the lower court to correct or revisit the issues at hand. In essence, remanding a case is about redirecting it to ensure that justice is appropriately served based on the Supreme Court's interpretation.