What is the appropriate condition for granting summary judgment?

Summary judgment is a legal process that allows the court to decide a case without a full trial when there are no genuine issues of material fact that would warrant a trial. This means that one party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law based on the evidence presented.

In this context, having no essential facts in dispute is crucial; it indicates that both parties agree on the facts, but disagree on how the law applies to those facts or the interpretation of the law itself. When the facts are clear and uncontested, the court can decide the case based solely on the legal principles involved, without needing to hold a trial to resolve factual disagreements. This expedites the legal process, prevents unnecessary trials, and allows the court system to allocate resources more efficiently.

The other conditions mentioned, such as having essential facts in dispute or evidence being ruled inadmissible, could lead to a full trial as they indicate areas where factual clarification is necessary or the information cannot be used to support a party's case. Similarly, an agreement on the terms of the dispute does not itself meet the criteria for summary judgment, as the court still needs to ascertain the absence of any factual disagreements. Thus, the absence of essential facts in dispute is the key criterion that justifies