What is the likely outcome for Kyle, who sued a restaurant after a small piece of bone lodged in his throat but did not sustain any real damages?

In this situation, the likely outcome for Kyle is that he will not collect any damages because he did not sustain any real damages from the incident. In order to succeed in a lawsuit, a plaintiff must generally demonstrate that they have suffered actual damages as a result of the defendant's actions.

In Kyle's case, the fact that a small piece of bone lodged in his throat might not be sufficient to prove tangible harm, especially if he did not incur medical expenses, miss work, or experience other losses that typically warrant compensation. Courts usually require clear evidence of injury or loss to justify awarding damages, whether those damages are economic (such as medical bills) or non-economic (like pain and suffering). Without such evidence, Kyle's claim lacks the necessary foundation to result in a financial recovery.

The other options involve the assumption of harm or damages that Kyle did not claim or prove, such as receiving compensation for emotional distress or legal fees. These cannot be awarded in the absence of demonstrable damages stemming from the incident.